News

With Uncertainty in Congress, Scott Administration Holds on Major Health Care Changes

During his gubernatorial campaign, Gov. Phil Scott said that if he was elected, he would move to eliminate Vermont's health care exchange and bring the state into the federal system. But just three weeks into his term, the message from his administration has changed dramatically.

That's because while it's likely that the Republican Congress in Washington will vote to repeal the Affordable Care Act, there's no consensus on how to replace it.

Human Services Secretary Al Gobeille says it makes no sense for Vermont to implement major reforms without knowing what Congress is going to do.

“I think we're talking about something that is a really, really lengthy planning and execution process if you're going to change,” said Gobeille. “You wouldn't want to do that and then have it disrupted by Washington, so we're going to keep doing what we're doing for now."

In the meantime, the Scott Administration is taking steps to reduce the number of Vermonters who purchase their coverage on the exchange. They're going to require that all individuals who don't qualify for Medicaid or state premium assistance purchase their coverage directly from the insurance companies. [...] 

Michael Fisher, the chief health care advocate for the state of Vermont, supports the administration's decision to take a wait-and-see approach with the future of health care in the state.

"There's so much uncertainty on the federal level, it's hard to imagine how we on the state level, how the administration could possibly predict at this moment how to make changes in access to health care," said Fisher.

Fisher is concerned that some of the people who will now be required to buy their coverage directly from the insurance companies might develop problems if their income drops during the course of the year. He wants to be certain that these individuals will still be able to qualify for state subsides if this happens.

Fisher is also concerned about proposals being discussed in Washington that would transfer funding for the Medicaid program into a state block grant. This approach would give states more flexibility in using Medicaid funds, but it would also cap how much a state could receive in any given year even if enrollment increased.

"Often the term 'block grant' is used as a euphemism for reduction in federal participation, and that would obviously be very concerning for us who are fighting to maintain the affordability of care,” said Fisher.

Fisher says his office is fielding numerous calls from Vermonters who are concerned that changes in federal health care policies will limit their coverage in the future.

Burlington debates a kinder way to tackle evictions

One city councilor thinks Burlington can do more to support public housing tenants on the brink of eviction, but those operating the buildings say they already follow procedures to help troubled residents remain housed.

The North District's Dave Hartnett is pushing for the creation of a task force to study the issue. Specifically, Hartnett wants to examine what happens when Burlington Housing Authority, Cathedral Square and Champlain Housing Trust decide to terminate a lease.

"Right now, I think we've identified that we do have somewhat of a little crisis in Burlington with people living in public housing that deal with some mental health crises," he said in early January.

The decision to evict someone from subsidized housing is a serious one, said Jessica Radbord, a Legal Aid attorney who often represents tenants in evictions cases. She said those who lose housing often end up in the city's overburdened shelters, seeking hotel vouchers from the state or simply sleeping outdoors.

Hartnett hopes to avoid another case like that of Ralph "Phil" Grenon, whom city police ftally shot during a standoff in March 2016. Police said the 76-year-old was threatening self-harm and was facing eviction from his South Square apartment due to his long history of making threats to other residents and the staff of Burlington Housing Authority, which operates that building. Grenon was killed after he threatened police with a knife when they entered his apartment for a welfare check.

Hartnett and Councilors Sara Giannoni and Selene Colburn, who sit on the public safety committee, met with representatives of public housing organizations in early January to discuss Hartnett's initiative. The housing authority representatives — including Sarah Russell, who runs the housing retention team at Burlington Housing Authority — detailed the process they go through for terminating leases.

The goal of the housing retention team, Russell said, is to keep residents in their homes. They are well aware that losing subsidized housing can lead to homelessness and the housing retention team offers many chances for troubled tenants to come into compliance with their leases, Russell said.

There's a difference between an eviction and a termination, she said. An eviction is a court proceeding. If a judge rules in favor of the Burlington Housing Authority, the tenant has a set amount of time to vacate the apartment before law enforcement escorts the resident off the property. However, in advance of involving the courts, housing agencies send a termination letter that notifies the resident that their lease will be broken.

Most terminations never make it to court, Russell said. Rather, they get resolved in informal hearings, where the tenant and their support team create a plan to avoid the problems that got the tenant into termination proceedings in the first place.

Grenon's eviction case had yet to make it to court at the time of his fatal encounter with police. The Burlington Free Press did not find an eviction case for Grenon, and Lt. Dan Gammelin of the Chittenden County Sheriff's Office said the case had never reached his office. Russell declined to talk about Grenon's case, citing client confidentiality.

Generally, Russell said Burlington Housing Authority is still willing to work things out with the tenants, even after a case moves to court.

Earlier this month, lawyer William Dysart of Vermont Legal Aid's Senior Citizens Project staved off the eviction of his client  Andrew Cushing from South Square, the same Burlington Housing Authority-operated building where Grenon died last March. Cushing, a disabled elderly resident, lives on $800 per month and was facing eviction proceedings for nonpayment of rent.

Cushing's case demonstrates how long the eviction process can take. Burlington Housing Authority officials first sent a letter informing Cushing of the intention to terminate his lease seven months prior to his court trial Jan. 13.

Dysart said his client was able to gather the money to pay back rent, plus fees, through help from some family and some community groups, including the Committee on Temporary Shelter.

Dysart said the agencies are usually willing to work out a payment plan, at least the first time a tenant falls behind on rent.

Despite some hiccups with Cushing's case — like asking him to pay fees that totaled more than his $232.00 monthly rent — Dysart said he finds the agencies to be even-handed. Still, he said facing an eviction proceeding in court can be be anxiety-inducing for his elderly clients, which can exacerbate health issues.

Even after hearing from the agencies about their procedures, Hartnett has pressed forward with efforts to form a task force, which he expects to come before the full City Council on Monday. The task force will include representatives from the housing agencies, Legal Aid attorneys, mental health professionals and public housing tenants.

Hartnett said he was particularly focused on the way the agency had notified Grenon his lease was terminated. In an early meeting after Grenon's death, he said, it came out that the agency had left a letter on Grenon's door because he wasn't home.

​"There has to be a better delivery of that notice," Hartnett said.

Russell said the Burlington Housing Authority complies with Vermont state law in delivering the termination letters. The notices are either mailed via first class or certified mail or occasionally hand-delivered.

At the time of Hartnett's meeting with the housing agencies, Russell said the Burlington Housing Authority had nine open eviction cases. But Russell said the agency did not keep precise data on how many terminations ended in evictions, and how many evictions are averted.

Leaders from Committee for Temporary Shelter has been pushing for better oversight.

"We want organizations that receive public funding to track evictions to create a baseline for analyzing eviction data," said Becky Holt, a spokeswoman for the nonprofit.

Analyzing the data could create insights into underlying causes, Holt said.

The sheriff's office is responsible for serving notices of evictions to tenants, and enforcing the orders to vacate once the court has ruled. Lt. Gammelin, whose office serves eviction notices and then sees that a legal decision is enforced, estimated that less than half of the cases that went to court in the housing authorities ended in an actual eviction. By comparison, he said, almost all of the cases brought by private landlords end in actual evictions. He estimated the annual number of evictions from private housing to be in the hundreds versus about a dozen from public housing.

The housing authorities said the task force would offer them an opportunity to share their experience in keeping people housed and discuss the greater mental health issues facing the agencies and the city.

With more resources, Russell said, her housing retention team could become a resource for the greater Burlington community to turn to, including private landlords.

For now, Hartnett said, he wants to stay focused on the public housing agencies.

"It's public housing," he said. "We have a responsibility to the people who live there."

Outlook: Vermont on the brink of an Affordable Care Act repeal

With an Affordable Care Act repeal on the horizon, Vermont’s leaders are trying to predict the future amid changing messages coming from Washington.

“People want certainty, and there isn’t any,” state Sen. Jane Kitchel, D-Caledonia, chair of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, told Watchdog. “One day, [Trump] is talking about repealing the ACA, and then he says he wants to provide coverage for everyone. At this point, all we can do is track the situation closely.”

According to the George-Soros-funded Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, Vermont is poised to lose $3 billion in federal funding over the next 10 years if the law is repealed. Moreover, 35,000 Vermonters stand to lose insurance coverage....

While Vermont operates a state health care exchange, the state is intricately connected to the ACA through Medicaid.

Sarah Lueck, senior policy analyst at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, a progressive think-tank focused on policies that impact low-income Americans, told Watchdog that each state will have to evaluate the greatest areas of need based off of individual demographics. In Vermont, that demographic is likely to be low-middle-class Medicaid users.

Vermont has the most expansive Medicaid coverage of any state. The ACA expanded eligibility for low-income adults, but Vermont also negotiated a global commitment waiver with the federal Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services. The waiver further expanded Medicaid coverage by allowing the state to determine wider eligibility and finance programs like the Blueprint for Health.

Because Medicaid is so expansive in Vermont, certain brackets of beneficiaries are likely to face cuts. ...

Republicans have proposed dramatic changes to Medicaid structure, such as giving states control through block grants. Past Republican budget proposals have also included a per-capita spending cap intended to reduce spending by $1 trillion over 10 years. Critics say the funding reductions will hurt states’ abilities to continue with innovative health programs, such as Vermont’s Medicaid waiver. [...]

Michael Fisher, chief health care advocate at Vermont Legal Aid, a nonprofit law firm created by the Legislature protect Vermont consumers, said his office is ready for whatever plan Republicans present. “We will work with every fiber of our beings to make sure we have improved access to care,” he told Watchdog. [...]

Fisher encourages Vermonters to contact state and federal representatives if they are concerned about their health care. Since no one knows the future, elected officials need to know “what does the average Vermonter feel.”

A Joint Statement from the National Legal Aid & Defender Association (NLADA) and the Shriver Center

Members of the legal aid and public defender community were horrified and outraged by the killings of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile. Two more Black lives taken by those who ostensibly serve and protect. We must find a better path toward justice for our society and for people of color. A first step for our community is to state firmly that we stand in solidarity with the Black community and against the racial inequality that still plagues our nation.

We affirm what should be undeniable—Black Lives Matter. The recurring violence against Black people is but an extreme manifestation of our society’s persistent racism, which denies the Black community, and other communities of color, the right and opportunity to be safe and healthy, to work and live with dignity, and to flourish.

We live in a country where those tasked with protecting our communities too often possess unfounded biases, whether implicit or explicit, that Black people pose a constant danger. This has led to situations where having a broken taillight or selling cigarettes or CDs is punishable by death; where reaching for a wallet is an act of aggression warranting a lethal response.

Our country has always been plagued by these beliefs—that Black communities and other communities of color are criminal and untrustworthy. This is not limited to one part of the country; it is a systemic national problem stretching from New York to Minnesota, California to Florida, and beyond. Our solutions must also be national and systemic. We must address the significant role that race plays in policing practices. Members of the legal aid and public defender community must form genuine and sustainable, community-led partnerships aimed at bridging the racial divide in our country.

Honoring this commitment will take hard work and honest self-criticism. “We’ve always done it this way” is not enough. We commit to a hard look at our work and to ensuring our efforts are driven by the experiences of people of color and an explicit commitment to combating racism. We commit to a hard look at ourselves and our organizations to consciously challenge our own biases and ways we unintentionally contribute to systems of racial disadvantage. We commit to building enduring alliances with communities who struggle against racism every day. Our work must support community leadership.

As we honor the pain and suffering of the communities that have lost loved ones, including the five officers killed in Dallas, we must be guided by justice and love. For us, that path starts with a commitment to be steadfast allies in the pursuit of racial justice. We must work together with all stakeholders, including law enforcement, to develop solutions to these very pressing problems.

As an immediate next step, we will work with our partners to develop an Action Plan for Racial Justice that can guide our organizations in effectuating our commitment.

Pages